Healthy Combination

Seniority plays an substantive role in the military. Rank is highly important because their efficiency of acquiring things d unmatched depends on fast com earthly concernds corresponding fast implementation. That is why leading here is very crucial. One does not easily get promoted or get his own ship to command. scorn the fact that everyone already looks up to you and no matter how worked yourself off, these simply arent enough. 1 Like what The skipper said to Lt.Tyler, one has to be able-bodied to make hard decisions found on imperative information asking men to carry come forward rules of orders that result to their deaths. Because the true test of being a spend-leader is not scarce willingness to lay his own vivification on the line for his men, not whole his bravery, but his strength to have to lay just aboutone elses life for the crew, for the mission and then, at the end of the day, having to pay for its consequences. In U-571 (2000), maybe the office that notic eably best depicted being an astounding leader and, at the same time a companion, is The oldtimer.Being somewhat a middleman surrounded by the new Captain and the crew, during their battle with the national socialists, Chief, in his years in combat, was able to successfully be a good leader and accomplice whe neer the measure demanded it of him. Some of the crewmen might have thought that, when The Captain died when the S33 was blown up, The Chief was the one that should take command instead of the a great deal younger Lt. Tyler. Once, a crew member kept saying this is crazy, this is crazy hes gonna get us killed to the idea that Lt. Tyler didnt want to use the Nazis Enigma to radio for help. The Chief said, Navy said its more important than you, him, mefine. Were gonna die trying. That aint crazy. Thats our job. The stubborn crewman responds with what I dont seem to interpret Chief, is how come youre not in-charge. In the middle of his blabbering on about _______________ _____ 1. Military Rank. 2004. Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. militaryspot. com/military-rank. htm 1why Tyler shouldnt be in command, The Chief suddenly grabbed curb of his shirt and held him by the neck. Lt. Tyler is your commanding officer and you will respect that man as such. In this particular scene, The Chief was a leader in a sense that he recognizes when a crewman needs some straightening up and, also he is a very good follower in a sense that he defended the superior being insulted at the back. At these moments, he displayed glory when he was effortlessly able to go over the praises, and get down to serious business.His principles are unwavering, unconditional. Attitude such as these give a command consistency and action in highly unfavorable situations such as battlefields. Contrary to conventional menstruation of view, being a follower and a leader seems to be much more of a role played in an interrelated trend than a role as played in completely setback way s. Yes, one cannot be a leader without being a follower and following cannot be without leading. To be able to fully understand one, one has to understand the another(prenominal), or both will not stand.One cannot exist without the other they complete each other. In the context of this film, or life in general for that matter, it is impossible to discuss leadership without discussing followership, and vice versa. 2 This conceit can be seen in the persona of the Chief. The concept of leadership and followership is healthily embedded in The Chiefs heart and mind, and through this, he is able to contribute significantly to the welfare of the crew and the accomplishment of the mission. If besides many soldiers were to lack this, it will kill a crew. Doubt is a given when there are high risks involved. Playing with the lives of men is never easy. thither are a lot of gray areas, areas where a soldier is confronted with dilemmas. The Chief experienced this at 160 meters below water sur face. Despite the risks involved The _____________________ 2. Lt disruption Sharon M. Latour and Lt Col Vicki J. Rast, Dynamic Followership, (2004) Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. govleaders. org/dynamic_followership. htm. Chief followed Lt. Tyler to dive the supererogatory meters. If Lt.Tyler made a mistake in his calculations or estimations, they all couldve drowned when the paladin barely held itself together under the pressure of 200 meters underwater. But they were lucky. What seemed to be wrong turned out to be right. In reality, perhaps it is much harder to choose. A young enlisted officer also came to this situation, where his ability to follow was thinning. Lt. Tyler had to order him to swim under the flooded pipes and tighten those that need tightening so that a torpedo can be launched.Obeying might kill him and not obeying might kill the crew. This time though, it wasnt as happy an finishing as The Chiefs was when he followed orders. The kid drowned. They were able to let the enemy but they sacrificed a life. There are no consume lines as to which extents will a soldier follow or not. There are no set qualifications as to who must go prototypical. perhaps there never will. But one thing is clear, leading or following, the sake of the crew as a whole must be put first before an individuals, the countrys first before the self. ____________________1. Lt Col Sharon M. Latour and Lt Col Vicki J. Rast, Dynamic Followership, (2004) Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. govleaders. org/dynamic_followership. htm. 2. Military Rank. 2004. Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. militaryspot. com/military-rank. htm BIBLIOGRAPHY Lt Col Latour, Sharon M. and Lt Col Rast, Vicki J. Dynamic Followership. Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. govleaders. org/dynamic_followership. htm, 2004. Military Rank. Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http//www. militaryspot. com/military-rank. htm, 2004.