Larry Summers Memo :: essays research papers

Larry spends MemoA controversy exists whether the World Bank should be encouraging migration of soggy industries to less-developed countries. Larry summer challenges that the World Bank should persuade much(prenominal) a migration. Others contend that these less-developed countries, despite their economic plight, should not be coerced into harboring dirty industries, a position I support.(A1) In his first argument summertime wants to force a sudden plus in taint, which would cause an usefulness in the economy, of lower wage countries. spend justifies his beliefs by giving an ideal of circumstantial as hominem. He states, Health impairing pollution should by make in the country with final cost, which impart be the country with the lowest salary. An assumption is made by Summer, where he concludes that lowest cost countries will have the lower wages. He concludes by saying, these low wage countries should bring high pollution. The premise of Summers argument is assumed t rue, so his argument is invalid, but strong.(C1) Many agree with Summer on his place of high-pollution industries in lesser-developed countries. They claim that it is economic logic to fill the countries with low wages with profitable industries. By doing this, it would cause more people to want to screw in a less populated area and work for higher(prenominal) wages. A sudden increase in population would also increase the number of the labor force. By doing this, more workers and industries would rapidly affect the ingathering of the economy. (R1) In closing the first argument Summer commits to subjective delusion when he states dumping toxic waste is logical and impeccable. He develops this argument by using errors in reasoning, such as these examples. Summer also makes ambiguous claims by make a personal flak catcher on the reader. The develop we should face up to that tells the readers they have been denying something. Summer uses this phrase to conclude his argument of pol lution dumping. (A2) In the second argument, Summers discusses his opinion of Environmental issues. He states, Ive always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly under-polluted. This is clearly a subjective claim and Summers opinion. He vaguely assumes that a country could be under-polluted. The pollution of the world is not a natural occurrence the waste of globe creates it. This waste should not be pressured upon a geographical area if they do not create it. A clean and healthy environment is the lonesome(prenominal) thing many lesser-developed countries have to cherish.